Mixtures between glyphosate formulations and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the control of Chloris elata

Authors

  • Alfredo Junior Paiola Albrecht Federal University of Paraná. R. Pioneiro. 2153. Jardim Dallas. 85950-000. Palotina. Paraná. Brazil
  • André Felipe Moreira Silva University of São Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture. Av. Pádua Dias. 235. Agronomia. Piracicaba. São Paulo. Brazil
  • Arthur Arrobas Martins Barroso Federal University of Paraná. R. dos Funcionários. 1.540. Juveve. Curitiba. Paraná. Brazil
  • Leandro Paiola Albrecht Federal University of Paraná. R. Pioneiro. 2153. Jardim Dallas. 85950-000. Palotina. Paraná. Brazil
  • Henrique Fabrício Placido State University of Maringá. Maringá. Paraná, Brazil. Av. Colombo. 5790. Zona 7. Maringá. Paraná. Brazil
  • Lucas Rafael de Marco University of São Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture. Av. Pádua Dias. 235. Agronomia. Piracicaba. São Paulo. Brazil
  • Luisa Carolina Baccin University of São Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture. Av. Pádua Dias. 235. Agronomia. Piracicaba. São Paulo. Brazil
  • Ricardo Victoria-Filho University of São Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture. Av. Pádua Dias. 235. Agronomia. Piracicaba. São Paulo. Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.026

Keywords:

chemical control, clethodim, haloxyfop, quizalofop, sethoxydim, tank mix

Abstract

Chloris elata is an important weed for grain and sugarcane crops. In addition to its aggressiveness, it may show resistance to glyphosate herbicide. In this context, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of glyphosate formulations, isolated or in association with ACCase inhibitors, in controlling C. elata (putatively resistant to glyphosate) at different developmental stages. Four experiments were conducted in a completely randomized design. Treatments consisted of glyphosate application under different formulations with ACCase inhibitors, isolated or in mixtures. Applications were carried out at the stages of four fully expanded leaves in Experiment I, four tillers in Experiment II, and at regrowth of the four-tiller plants in Experiments III and IV. Applications of glyphosate isopropylamine salt associated with sethoxydim or clethodim showed to be among the best treatments in Experiments I, II, and III, presenting control scores equal to or greater than 90%. However, not even these treatments could provide successful control in Experiment IV. Moreover, and regardless of the formulation, isolated glyphosate, showed 85% (Experiment III) and 50% (Experiment IV) maximum controls. Associations between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides showed to be effective in controlling C. elata, especially at early developmental stages. In general, isolated herbicides provided lower percentages of control, as well as higher values of dry matter. Sole herbicide applications were not effective in controlling C. elata (putatively resistant to glyphosate), regardless of the developmental stage.

Highlights:

  • Mixtures between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting have been shown to be effective in C. elata control, especially in the early development stages.
  • Isolated herbicide applications were not effective in controlling C. elata, regardless of the development stage.
  • Mixtures between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting is more important in the control than the glyphosate formulation or ACCase-inhibiting used.

Downloads

Published

07-07-2021

Issue

Section

Plant protection

Most read articles by the same author(s)