El concepto tomista de naturaleza como propedéutica al estudio de la comunidad política: una herencia aristotélica

Jorge Martínez

doi:10.48162/rev.35.013

Authors

Jorge Martínez Universidad Católica San Pablo de Arequipa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.35.013

Keywords:

Nature, essence, Politics

Abstract

One of the most important concepts in Aristotelian philosophy is that of nature. This is very useful even in its political use, since nature can be considered as the essence from the dynamic point of view. In fact, “nature” is one of the meanings of “being” for the Stagirite. In the reception of Aristotle by the Latin West, this concept retains all its metaphysical-practical significance. Thomas Aquinas, in his appropriation of the concept, obtains from it some benefits that are still outlined in Aristotle, but it is evident that the ethical-political scope of "nature" finds in Thomas Aquinas an enrichment derived from a broadening of his teleological perspective. Thus, without denying the essentials of the Aristotelian use of "nature", Thomas Aquinas manages to articulate this notion in the broader finalistic perspective proposed by Christianity.

References

Bazán, Bernardo. “La corporalité selon saint Thomas”. Revue Philosophique de Louvain, n.° 51 (1983): 369-409.

Boecio. Contra Eutychen et Nestorium, en The Theological Tractates. Londres: William Heinemann Ltd., 1978.

Couloubaritsis, Lambros. L’avènement de la science physique. Bruxelles: Ousía, 1980.

Ghisalberti, Alessandro. “La concezione della natura nel commento di Tommaso d’Aquino alla Metafísica di Aristotele”. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 66, (1974): 533-540.

Heisenberg, Victor. “The Idea of Nature in Contemporary Physics”, en Main currents of Western Thought: Readings in Western European Intellectual History from the Middle Ages to the Present, editado por Franklin Le Van Baumer, 704-708. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1978.

Kéraly, Hughes prefacio a La Politique. Avant propos, traduction et explication. Paris: Nouvelles Éditions Latines, 1974.

Laberthonnière, Louis y Louis Canet. Oeuvres de Laberthonnière: Études sur Descartes. Paris: J. Vrin, 1935.

Laporta, Jorge. “Pour trouver le sens exact des termes ‘appetitus naturalis’, ‘desiderium naturale’, ‘amor naturalis’, etc. chez Thomas d’Aquin”. Arch. d’Hist. Doctr. et Litt. du moyen âge 40, (1973): 37-95.

Le Van Baumer, Franklin. Main currents of Western Though. Readings in Western European Intellectual History from the Middle Ages to the Present. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1978.

Nicolas, Marie-Joseph. “L’idée de nature dans la pensée de saint Thomas d’Aquin”. Revue Thomiste. n° 4 (1974): 533-590.

Rosemann, Philipp. Omne ens est aliquid. Introduction à la lecture du “système” philosophique de saint Thomas d’Aquin. Louvain-Paris: Peeters, 1996.

Toccafondi, Eugenio. “Il concetto di natura come aspetto dinámico dell’essere nella metafísica tomistica”, en La Filosofía della natura nel Medioevo: Atti del terzo congresso internazionale di filosofia medioevale. Passo della Mendola (Trento). 31 agosto - 5 settembre 1964, editado por Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia Medioevale, 576-586. Milano: Vita e Pensiero, 1996.

Van Steenberghen, Ferdinand. “La Philosophie de la nature au XIII siècle”, en La Filosofía della natura nel Medioevo: Atti del terzo congresso internazionale di filosofia medioevale. Passo della Mendola (Trento). 31 agosto - 5 settembre 1964, editado por Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia Medioevale, 122-123. Milano: Vita e Pensiero, 1996.

Veysset, Philippe. Situation de la politique dans la pensée de st Thomas d’Aquin. París: Cèdre, 1981.