Reason, Action and Language in Current Kant's Intepretation

Authors

  • Daniel Leserre Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Buenos Aires (Argentina)

Keywords:

Action, Kant, Language, Reason

Abstract

Beyond methodological differences relevant present lines of Kant’s interpretation coincide in a common core. They held that Kant’s philosophy can have value as a today’s philosophy, they agree with conceiving Kant’s philosophy as a comprehensive totality, and eventually they put the theoretical philosophy under the orientation of the practical one. This article claims that an argument that relates reason, action and language can be identified within that common core, particularly from a renewed assessment of the Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View.

Author Biography

Daniel Leserre, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Buenos Aires (Argentina)

El autor es Profesor en Filosofía, Licenciado en Psicología y Doctor en Filosofía por la U.N. de Buenos Aires. Es Profesor Titular en la Escuela de Humanidades de la Universidad Nacional de San Martín e Investigador Independiente del CONICET. Su campo de investigación es la historia de la filosofía del lenguaje a partir de Kant. Es autor de alrededor de sesenta trabajos en publicaciones nacionales e internacionales.

References

Brandt, Reinhardt. Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (1798). Hamburgo: F. Meiner, 1999.

Brandt, Reinhardt. "The Guiding Idea of Kant’s Anthropology and the Vocation of the Human Being", en Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, ed. Brian Jacobs y Patrick Kain. (Cambridge - Nueva York, Cambridge UP, 2003), 85-104.

Brandt, Reinhardt. Die Bestimmung des Menschen bei Kant. Hamburgo: F. Meiner, 2007.

Brandt, Reinhardt. "Die Bestimmung des Menschen bei Kant als Zentrum der Kantischen Philosophie", en Kant in der Gegenwart, ed. Jürgen Stolzenberg (Berlín – Nueva York: W. de Gruyter, 2007), 17- 49.

Falduto, Antonino y Heiner Klemme. "Die Anthropologie im Kontext von Kants kritischer Philosophie", en Fines Hominis?, ed., (Bielefeld; Transcript, 2015), 17-32.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Wahrheit und Methode. Tubinga: J. B. Mohr, 1972.

Heidemann, Dieter y Kristina Engelhard (ed.). Warum Kant heute? (Berlín - Nueva York: W. de Gruyter, 2003).

Höffe, Otfried. Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Die Grundlegung der modernen Philosophie. Munich: C.H.Beck, 2004.

Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Berlín - Nueva York: W. de Gruyter, 1900 y ss.

Kant, Immanuel. Crítica de la razón pura, trad. Mario Caimi. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2009.

Kant, Immanuel. Antropología en sentido pragmático, trad. Mario Caimi. Buenos Aires: Losada, 2009.

Kaulbach, Friederich. Das Prinzip Handlung in der Philosophie Kants. Berlín - Nueva York: W. de Gruyter, 1978.

Lamacchia, Ada. "Transzendentale und logische Topik", en Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Mainz 1974, I, ed. Gerhardt Funke y Joachim Kopper. Berlín – Nueva York: W. de Gruyter, 1975, 116-139.

Lenk, Hans y Reiner Wiehl, (ed.). Kant Today – Kant aujourd’hui – Kant heute. Berlín – Londres: LIT, 2006.

Rescher, Nicholas. Kant and the Reach of Reason. U.S.A: Cambridge UP, 2000.

Simon, Josef. Kant. Die fremde Vernunft und die Sprache der Philosophie. Berlín - Nueva York: W. de Gruyter, 2003.

Stolzenberg, Jürgen (ed.). Kant in der Gegenwart. Berlín - Nueva York: W. de Gruyter, 2007.

Sturma, Dieter. "Was ist der Mensch? Kants vierte Frage und der Übergang von der philosophischen Anthropologie zur Philosophie der Person", en Warum Kant heute?, ed. Dieter Heidemann y Kristina Engelhard. Berlín - Nueva York: W. de Gruyter, 2003, 264-285.

Putnam, Hilary. El pragmatism. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1999.
Wilson, Holly L. Kant’s pragmatic anthropology: its origin, meaning, and critical significance. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006.

Downloads

Published

18-12-2019

How to Cite

Leserre, Daniel. 2019. “Reason, Action and Language in Current Kant’s Intepretation”. Philosophia 79 (2):59-89. https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/philosophia/article/view/2813.

Issue

Vol. 79 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Artículos

License

Se permite la reproducción de los artículos siempre y cuando se cite la fuente. This work is protected under license Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) You are free to: Share "” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; Adapt "” remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution "” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial "” You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

ShareAlike "” If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

No additional restrictions "” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

For more information, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en