Can a theory of distributive justice disregard the deserve?
Keywords:
Merit, Meritocracy, equality of opportunity, Distributive JusticeAbstract
The aim of this paper is to make a case for using the deserve as a distributive justice criterion without excluding other rules such as basic needs. The study discusses how to deserve has evolved over time resulting into a modern concept, its relationship to chance, and presents a variant of equality of opportunities that legitimates it. In addition, it shows that there is no intrinsic meaning of merit so it needs a political definition.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Se permite la reproducción de los artículos siempre y cuando se cite la fuente. This work is protected under license Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) You are free to: Share "” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; Adapt "” remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution "” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial "” You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike "” If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions "” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
For more information, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en