Fields of Sense: Features and Paradoxes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.50.001Keywords:
Human Sciences, Epistemology, Ontology, RealismAbstract
The purpose of this article is to identify the most relevant features of the proposal of the fields of meaning, as well as to point out some of the possible paradoxes it contains. To this end, we begin by introducing the proposal in the broad framework of speculative realism; then, we point out the most relevant ideas of the fields of meaning, especially their ascription to ontological and epistemological realism; finally, we suggest some paradoxes included in this proposal. As an original perspective, sense fields are considered as a contribution to the epistemological foundation of the human sciences.
References
Aguirre, Juan Carlos. “La fenomenología como realismo real”, Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 59 (2020): 19-28.
Braver, Lee. “A brief history of Continental Realism”, Continental Philosophy Review 45 (2012): 261-289.
Dukic, Vladimir y Morin, Marie-Eve. “Introduction: Continental Realism -Picking Up the Pieces”, en Continental Realism and Its Discontents, ed. Marie-Eve Morin. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press, 2019. 1-17.
Ferraris, Maurizio. Manifiesto del nuevo realismo. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, 2013.
Gabriel, Markus. “Neutral Realism”, The Monist, 98 (2015): 181-196.
Gabriel, Markus. Yo no soy mi cerebro. Barcelona: Pasado & Presente, 2016.
Gabriel, Markus. Por qué el mundo no existe. Barcelona: Pasado & Presente, 2017.
Gabriel, Markus. Sentido y existencia. Barcelona: Herder, 2017.
Gabriel, Markus. El poder del arte. Santiago de Chile: Roneo, 2019.
Gabriel, Markus. The limits of Epistemology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2020.
Jerez, José Luis. Introducción al realismo analógico. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Flores, 2017.
Lemos, Noah. An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Meillassoux, Quentin. Después de la finitud. Ensayo sobre la necesidad de la contingencia. Buenos Aires: Caja negra, 2018.
Popper, Karl. El mito del marco común. En defensa de la ciencia y la racionalidad. Barcelona: Paidós, 2005.
Putnam, Hilary. Las mil caras del realismo. Barcelona: Paidós, 1994.
Quintanilla, Ángel. “Introducción: el realismo necesario”, en H. Putnam, Las mil caras del realismo. Barcelona: Paidós, 1994.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Philosophia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Se permite la reproducción de los artículos siempre y cuando se cite la fuente. This work is protected under license Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) You are free to: Share "” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; Adapt "” remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution "” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial "” You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike "” If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions "” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
For more information, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en
