William of Ockham and Adam of Wodeham on the Role of the Will in Attention, Visual Effort and the Intensification of a Vision

Lydia Deni Gamboa

doi:10.48162/rev.35.025

Authors

Lydia Deni Gamboa Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.35.025

Keywords:

William of Ockham, Adam of Wodeham, representational contents, passivity of the intellect, will

Abstract

William of Ockham and Adam of Wodeham hold different theories to explain how perceptual contents change and adapt to changes of the perceived object. Content changes occur in cases where there is (i) attention, (ii) visual effort or (iii) the intensification of a vision. Ockham’s theory of this subject involves the idea that the intellect is passive, but can perform with the help of the will. Ockham’s account leads to what I call the loop problem, since for him the will can only want what the intellect is aware of. Wodeham seems to notice this problem and, for this reason, departs from Ockham’s theory of perceptual content change. Wodeham’s account does not involve the will. For Wodeham perceptual content change depends only on the variability of the perceptual field.

Author Biography

Lydia Deni Gamboa, Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

Profesora-investigadora en la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la B. Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (México).

References

Brower-Toland, Susan. “Intuition, Externalism, and Direct Reference in Ockham.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 24, no. 4 (2007): 317–36.

Brower-Toland, Susan. “Medieval Approaches to Consciousness: Ockham and Chatton.” Philosophers Imprint 12 (2012): 1–29.

Brower-Toland, Susan. “William Ockham on the Scope and Limits of Consciousness.” Vivarium 52, no. 3–4 (2014): 197–219.

Brown, Deborah . “Augustine and Descartes on the Function of Attention in Perceptual Awareness.” In Consciousness from Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy, edited by Heinämaa, Sara, Lähteenmäki, Vili, and Remes, Pauliina, 153–75. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2007.

Gamboa, Lydia Deni. “El Conocimiento Intuitivo Como Garante Epistémico Según William of Ockham y Adam of Wodeham.” Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale 60 (January 2018): 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.BPM.5.116903.

Karger, Élizabeth. “Ockham and Wodeham on Divine Deception as a Skeptical Hypothesis.” Vivarium 42, no. 2 (2004): 225–36.

Karger, Élizabeth. “Mental Sentences According to Burley and to the Early Ockham,” Vivarium 34, no. 2 (1996): 192–230.

McCord Adams, Marilyn. William Ockham. Vol. 2. 2 vols. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987.

Ockham, Guillelmi de. OTh I. Scriptum in Librum Primum Sententiarum Ordinatio, Prologus et Distinctio Prima. Edited by Gedeon Gál.

Opera Philosophica et Theologica. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. Bonaventurae, 1967.

Ockham, Guillelmi de. OTh III. Scriptum in Librum Primum Sententiarum Ordinatio, Distinctiones IV-XVIII. Edited by Girardus I. Etzkorn. Opera Philosophica et Theologica. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. Bonaventurae, 1977.

Ockham, Guillelmi de. OTh VII. Quaestiones in Librum Quartum Sententiarum (Reportatio). Edited by Rega Wood and Gedeon Gál. Opera Philosophica et Theologica. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. Bonaventurae, 1984.

Ockham, Guillelmi de. OTh VIII. Quaestiones Variae. Edited by Girardus I. Etzkorn, Franciscus E. Kelley, and Josephus C. Wey C.S.B. Opera Philosophica et Theologica. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. Bonaventurae, 1984.

Ockham, Guillelmus de. OPh I. Summa Logicae. Edited by Philotheus Boehner, Gedeon Gál, and Stephanus Brown. Opera Philosophica et Theologica. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. Bonaventurae, 1974.

Ockham, Guillelmi de. OPh II. Expositio in Librum Perihermenias Aristotelis. Edited by Angelus Gambatese and Stephanus Brown. Opera Philosophica et Theologica. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. Bonaventurae, 1978.

Ockham, Guillelmi de. OPh IV. Expositio in Libros Physicorum Aristotelis, Prologus et Libri I-III. Edited by Vladimirus Richter and Gerhardus Leibold. Opera Philosophica et Theologica. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. Bonaventurae, 1985.

Ockham, Guillelmi de. OPh VI. Brevis Summa Libri Physicorum. Edited by Stephanus Brown. Opera Philosophica et Theologica. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. Bonaventurae, 1986.

Panaccio, Claude. “Intellections and Volitions in Ockham’s Nominalism.” In Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Martin Pickavé and Lisa Shapiro, 75–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Oxford Scholarship Online, 2013. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579914.003.0005.

Panaccio, Claude. “Ockham: Intuition and Knowledge.” In Rational Intuition: Philosophical Roots, Scientific Investigations, edited by Lisa M Osbeck and Barbara S Held, 55–74. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Panaccio, Claude. Ockham on Concepts. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub., 2004.

Panaccio, Claude, and David Piché. “Ockham’s Reliabilism and the Intuition of Non-Existents.” In Rethinking the History of Skepticism, edited by Henrik Lagerlund, 97–118. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010.

Pasnau, Robert. Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Silva, José Filipe. “Medieval Theories of Active Perception: An Overview.” In Active Perception in the History of Philosophy: From Plato to Modern Philosophy, edited by José Filipe Silva and Mikko Yrjönsuuri, 117–46. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04361-6_7.

Wood, Rega. “Calculating Grace: The Debate about Latitude of Forms According to Adam de Wodeham.” In Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy, edited by Simo Knuuttila, Reijo Työrinoja, and Sten Ebbesen, 2:373–91. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino, 1990.