Causality and Creation. The Analitic Philosophy of Religion and Thomas Aquinas on the Big Bang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.50.025Keywords:
Creation, Big Bang, causalitiy, Thomas AquinasAbstract
Analytic philosophy of religion seeks to clarify debates and foster dialogue with the empirical sciences. This article examines attempts to engage with contemporary cosmology on the question of creation, highlighting how some authors have reformulated thomistic theory to facilitate this interaction. However, we argue that Thomas Aquinas’ metaphysics, in its classical structure, provides robust philosophical resources for this dialogue without requiring substantial reformulations. Far from being an obstacle, the Thomistic framework offers conceptual tools that can enrich the conversation with science while maintaining its original philosophical coherence.
References
Aquino, Tomás de. 2000. Opera Omnia. Edición revisada y anotada por Enrique Alarcón. Pamplona: Universitatis Studiorum Navarrensis. http://www.corpusthomisticum.org.
Carroll, William E. 2007. “Creation and Science in the Middle Ages.” Blackfriars 88 (1018): 678–689.
Copan, Paul, y William Lane Craig. 2004. Creation out of Nothing: A Biblical, Philosophical, and Scientific Exploration. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
Craig, William Lane. 1998. “Creation and Conservation Once More.” Religious Studies 34 (2): 177–188.
Echavarría, Agustín, y Francisco O'Reilly. 2023. “Teología analítica.” En Diccionario Interdisciplinar Austral, editado por Claudia E. Vanney, Ignacio Silva y Juan F. Franck. http://dia.austral.edu.ar/Teología_analítica (acceso 11 de diciembre de 2023).
Ferro, Luis Santiago. 2015. La sabiduría filosófica siguiendo las huellas de Tomás de Aquino. 2.ª ed. Tucumán: Universidad del Norte Santo Tomás de Aquino.
Freddoso, Alfred J. 1988. “Medieval Aristotelianism and the Case against Secondary Causation in Nature.” En Divine and Human Action, editado por Thomas V. Morris, 74–118. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Grünbaum, Adolf. 1989. “The Pseudo-Problem of Creation in Physical Cosmology.” Philosophy of Science 56: 373–394.
Kvanvig, Jonathan L., y Hugh L. McCann. 1988. “Divine Conservation and the Persistence of the World.” En Divine and Human Action: Essays in the Metaphysics of Theism, editado por Thomas V. Morris, 13–49. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kvanvig, Jonathan L., y David Vander Laan. 2014. “Creation and Conservation.” En The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Editado por Edward N. Zalta. Ed. invierno 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/creation-conservation/ (acceso 11 de diciembre de 2023).
McCann, Hugh J., y Jonathan L. Kvanvig. 1991. “The Occasionalist Proselytizer: A Modified Catechism.” Philosophical Perspectives 5: 587–615.
Quinn, Philip L. 1983. “Divine Conservation, Continuous Creation and Human Action.” En The Existence and Nature of God, editado por Alfred J. Freddoso, 55–79. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Quinn, Philip L. 1985. “In the Search of the Foundations of Theism.” Faith and Philosophy 2 (4): 469–486.
Quinn, Philip L. 1988. “Divine Conservation, Secondary Causes, and Occasionalism.” En Divine and Human Action: Essays in the Metaphysics of Theism, editado por Thomas V. Morris, 50–73. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Quinn, Philip L. 1993. “Creation, Conservation and the Big Bang.” En Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds, editado por John Earman, Allen I. Janis, Gerarld J. Massey y Nicholas Rescher, 589–612. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Quinn, Philip L. 2003. “Cosmological Contingency and Theistic Explanation.” Faith and Philosophy 20 (5): 581–600.
Silva, Ignacio. 2015. “A Cause among Causes? God Acting in the Natural World.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (4): 99–114.
Wippel, John F. 2000. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Se permite la reproducción de los artículos siempre y cuando se cite la fuente. This work is protected under license Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) You are free to: Share "” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; Adapt "” remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution "” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial "” You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike "” If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions "” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
For more information, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en

