Placemaking for Piura

Methodological contribution in the management of post-covid interventions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.55.019

Keywords:

placemaking, COVID-19, citizen participation, Humanization of public space, public management

Abstract

In the city of Piura, in Peru, there are not many places for social interaction and free time activities because it has grown unevenly with few urban planning tools and very low social interest. The study shows the possibilities of Placemaking and introduces it as a tool in public management process. The aim of this mechanism is to carry out small-scale interventions, without concluding in the implementation of a specific project. Through qualitative tools it is expected to demostrate the application opportunities; and under an evaluation system, in relation to the 11 principles of Placemaking, recognize the limitations to be overcome. In this way, it is intended to encourage investigation into public urban intervention processes that include the citizen factor.

References

ARTEAGA, A. (2017). Espacio público, una aproximación conceptual. MODULO ARQUITECTURA-CUC, 19(1), 69-78.

BELLET-SANFELIU, C. (2009). IV Seminario de la Facultad de Arquitectura y Diseño de la Universidad de los Andes. Reflexiones sobre el espacio público. El caso de las ciudades intermedias. Mérida, Venezuela.

BID. (2020). 100 ideas para volver a la calle. Obtenido de volver a la calle: https://volveralacalle.com/ideas

ESPINOZA, Á., & FORT, R. (2020). Mapeo y tipología de la expansión urbana en el Perú. GRADE, ADI. Obtenido de GRADE: https://www.grade.org.pe/wp-content/uploads/EspinozaFort_GRADEADI_expansionurbana.pdf

GEHL, J. (2020). Public Space & Public life during COVID-19.

KARACOR, E. (2017). PlaceMaking Approachment to Accomplish Social Sustainability. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(4), 253-262.

MINISTERIO DE VIVIENDA, CONSTRUCCIÓN Y SANEAMIENTO. (2020). Plan de Desarrollo Metropolitano. Piura-Castilla-26 de Octubre 2020-2040. Piura.

ONU. (2020). UN-Habitat and the COVID-19 Response: Public Space.

PEIMBERT, A. J. (2014). Espacio público, lugar y paisaje: proximidades y distancias para una antropología urbana. Contexto. Revista de la Facultad de Arquitectura de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, VIII(8), 51-68.

PROJECT FOR PUBLIC SPACES. (2016). PLACEMAKING what If we built our cities around places ? Obtenido de http://www.pps.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Oct-2016-placemaking-booklet.pdf

RIVERA, J. (19 de abril de 2016). El 70% de las construcciones de Piura son informales y no soportarían sismo. Obtenido de El Tiempo: https://eltiempo.pe/el-70-de-las-construcciones-de-piura-son-informales-y-no-soportarian-sismo/

SATALOFF, R., JOHNS, M., & KOST, K. (2018). Libro blanco de Placemaking: Programa de urbanismo táctico e innovación en el espacio público. 1.

SILBERBERG, S. (2018). Places in the Making: How placemaking builds places and communities. MIT.

UN-HABITAT. (mayo de 2015). Habitat III Issue Papers - Public Space. United Nation Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development., 2015, 0-8.

WYCKOFF, M. (2014). Definition of Placemaking: Four Different Types. Planning & Zoning News, 1.

Published

28-07-2022

How to Cite

Calle Castillo, A., Zavala , M., & Schroeder , S. . (2022). Placemaking for Piura: Methodological contribution in the management of post-covid interventions. Proyección. Estudios Geográficos Y De Ordenamiento Territorial, 16(31), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.55.019