El potencial persuasivo de los montajes poético-imaginarios: una consideración retórico-lucreciana

Authors

  • Roberto Mattos Universidad Nacional de San Martín

Keywords:

rhetoric, somnium, simulacrum, image, voluntas, timor

Abstract

The interpretations of the controversial relationship between rhetoric and Epicureanism in De rerum natura do not contemplate the rhetorical considerations presented by Lucretius. This omission narrows the margin of interpretation attempting, above all, against the possibility of appreciating the originality of his thinking. Given this circumstance, we pretend reopen the discussion with the objective of taking the first steps in the establishment of an alternative and complementary approach that allows us to end with this omission. We hope to achieve this, assuming that one of his rhetorical considerations occurs when the philosopher attributes to certain poetic-imaginary montages the status of persuasive medium. Guided by this assumption, our work will consist in pointing out the terms in which it makes such attribution and revealing on which foundations this is sustained.

References

Asmis, E. (1983). Rhetoric and Reason in Lucretius. The American Journal of Philology, CIV (1), 36-66. Recuperado el 10 de octubre de 2015, de http://www.jstor.org/stable/293758

_________ (1984). Epicurus' Scientific Method. London: Ithaca.

Bailey, C. (1922). Titi Lucreti Cari. De rerum natura libri sex. Oxonii: E Typographeo Clarendoniano.

_________ (1926). Epicurus. The Extant Remains (With short critical apparatus, translation and notes). Oxford: The Clarendon press.

_________ (1940). The Mind of Lucretius. The American Journal of Philology, LXI (3), 278-291. Recuperado el 2 de diciembre de 2015, de
http://www.jstor.org/stable/290933

Blank, D. (1995) Philodemus on the Technicity of Rhetoric. En Obbink D. (Comp.). Philodemus and poetry: poetic theory and practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace (pp. 178–188). New York: Oxford University Press.

Boyancé, P. (1963) Lucrèce et l’épicurisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires De France.

Brown, R. (1987). Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De rerum natura IV, 1030–1287. (With prolegomena, text and translation). Leiden-New York: E.J. Brill.

Calboli, G., (2003) Lucrezio e la retorica, Paideia, LVIII, 187–206.

Císař, K. (2001). Epicurean Epistemology in Lucretius' De rerum natura IV 1-822. Listy Filologické / Folia Philologica, CXXIV (1/2), 1-54. Recuperado el 8 de
octubre de 2015, de http://www.jstor.org/stable/23468032

Classen, C. (1968). Poetry and Rhetoric in Lucretius. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, XCIX, 77-118. Recuperado
el 10 de marzo de 2016, de http://www.jstor.org/stable/2935834

Dalzell, A. (1974). Lucretius' exposition of the doctrine of images. Hermathena, CXVIII, 22-32.

De Lacy, Ph., y Benedict E. (1967) Plutarch’s Moralia in XV Volumes. V. 14. Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library.

Ernout, A. & Robin, L. (1962). Lucrèce. De rerum natura: commentaire exégétique et critique, précédé d'une introduction sur l 'art de Lucrèce et d 'une traduction des lettres et pensées d 'Épicure (Vols. 1-3). (2a ed). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

Glidden, D. (1979). Sensus and Sense Perception in the De rerum natura. California Studies in Classical Antiquity, XII, 155-181. Recuperado el 20 de
octubre de 2016, de www.jstor.org/stable/25010746

Godwin, J. (1992). Lucretius. De rerum natura IV (Edited with translation and commentary). Warminister, Wiltshire: Aris & Phillips Ltd.

Hicks, R. (1925). Diogenes Laertius. Lives of the eminent philosophers (With an English translation) (V. 2). New York: Putnam ́s sons; London: Heinemann.

Lathière A. (1972). Lucrece Traducteur d'Epicure: Animus, Anima dans les Livres 3 et 4 du De Rerum Natura. Phoenix, XXVI (2), 123-133. Recuperado el 20 de
noviembre de 2016, de http://www.jstor.org/stable/1087712

Marković, D. (2008). The rhetoric of explanation in Lucretius' De rerum natura. Leiden-Boston: Brill.

Mattos, R. (2016). Las incidencias de un recorte de la doctrina de los simulacra sobre las cuestiones relativas al amor en el De rerum natura de Lucrecio. (Tesis
de Licenciatura) UNSAM - EH. Recuperado el 17 de junio de 2017, de http://bit.ly/2f0VuzO

Milanese, G. (1989). Lucida carmina: comunicazione e scrittura da Epicuro a Lucrezio. Milán: Vita e pensiero.

Munro, H. [1864] (2009). Titi Lucreti Cari. De Rerum Natura Libri Sex (With a translation and notes). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schiesaro, A. (1987). Lucrezio, Cicerone, l'oratoria. Materiali E Discussioni per L'analisi Dei Testi Classici, (19), 29-61.

___________ (1989). A Note on Lucretius 4.1046. The Classical Quarterly, XXXIX (2), 555-557. Recuperado el 8 de septiembre de 2016, de http://www.jstor.org/stable/639396

Schrijvers, P. (1970). Horror ac divina voluptas; études sur la poétique et la poésie de Lucrèce. Amsterdam: A.M. Hakkert.

Sedley, D. (2004). Lucretius and the transformation of Greek wisdom. Cambridge England; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thury, E. (1987). Lucretius' Poem as a Simulacrum of the Rerum Natura. The American Journal of Philology, CVIII (2), 270-294. Recuperado el 18 de
noviembre de 2016, de http://www.jstor.org/stable/294817

Valentí Fiol, E., [1976] (2012). Lucrecio. De rerum natura. De la naturaleza (Introducción, traducción y notas). Barcelona: Acantilado.

Wallach, B., (1975), Lucretius and the Diatribe: De Rerum Natura II. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

How to Cite

Mattos, R. (2019). El potencial persuasivo de los montajes poético-imaginarios: una consideración retórico-lucreciana . Revista De Estudios Clásicos, 46, 97–118. Retrieved from https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/revistaestudiosclasicos/article/view/2267

Issue

Section

Artículos originales