Selectivity of latifolicides associated with glyphosate applied in post-emergence on soybean cultivars

Authors

  • Jhonatan Coradin Graduate Program in Plant Production. Universidade de Rio Verde. Rio Verde (Goiás), Brazil. Zip code: 75901-970.
  • Guilherme Braga Pereira Braz Graduate Program in Plant Production. Universidade de Rio Verde. Rio Verde (Goiás), Brazil. Zip code: 75901-970. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0396-7140
  • Sergio de Oliveira Procópio Research Department. EMBRAPA Meio Ambiente. Jaguariúna (São Paulo), Brazil. Zip code: 13918-110. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4350-7288
  • Alessandro Guerra da Silva Graduate Program in Plant Production. Universidade de Rio Verde. Rio Verde (Goiás), Brazil. Zip code: 75901-970. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9556-0312
  • Guilherme Sales Vian Graduate Program in Plant Production. Universidade de Rio Verde. Rio Verde (Goiás), Brazil. Zip code: 75901-970.
  • Paulo Victor Leão Lima Chavaglia Graduate Program in Plant Production. Universidade de Rio Verde. Rio Verde (Goiás), Brazil. Zip code: 75901-970.
  • Marco Antônio Rodrigues Goulart Graduate Program in Plant Production. Universidade de Rio Verde. Rio Verde (Goiás), Brazil. Zip code: 75901-970.
  • Matheus de Freitas Souza Graduate Program in Plant Production. Universidade de Rio Verde. Rio Verde (Goiás), Brazil. Zip code: 75901-970.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.098

Keywords:

Chemical control, Glycine max, herbicides, weeds

Abstract

The genetic improvement of soybean cultivars over the years has focused on increasing the yield capacity and tolerance to some abiotic and biotic factors, such as drought, diseases, and pests. However, during the transfer of genes of interest, some genes responsible for a lower tolerance to herbicides can be integrated into the genome of the new cultivar. Thus, tests designed to assess the tolerance of these new soybean cultivars to herbicides are needed to avoid yield losses caused by poisoning after application. The objective of this study was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicides associations applied in post-emergence of three soybean cultivars. The experimental design used was a randomized complete block, with four replications. The selected cultivars were M7110 IPRO®, Foco IPRO®, and Bônus IPRO®. The herbicides and the respective doses (g a.i. ha-1) used were: glyphosate (960), glyphosate + bentazon (960 + 600), glyphosate + fomesafen (960 + 175), glyphosate + lactofen (960 + 120), glyphosate + imazethapyr (960 + 100), glyphosate + chlorimuron (960 + 10), glyphosate + cloransulam (960 + 39.5), and a control without herbicide application. The components of growth and yield evaluated were: height, stand, the weight of one hundred grains, and yield. A visual note of intoxication was also made for each treatment. The application of post-emergence herbicides does not alter the plant stand of soybean cultivars. Also, these herbicides were not reduced the yield of M7110 IPRO® and Foco IPRO® cultivars. Both glyphosate isolated and mixed with lactofen or imazethapyr reduced yield of Bônus IPRO® cultivar.

Highlights

  • Herbicide associations applied post-emergence cause higher levels of injuries on soybean crop.
  • The visualization of injuries resulting from herbicides on soybean does not necessarily imply yield reductions.
  • The genetics of the soybean cultivar is decisive for the response in terms of sensitivity to herbicides.

Downloads

Published

22-02-2023

Issue

Vol. 55 No. 1 (2023): January-June

Section

Plant protection

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan las Políticas Editoriales.

 

Most read articles by the same author(s)