Seed Physiological Quality and Selectivity of Pre-Emergence Herbicides in Soybean (Glycine max L.)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.217Palabras clave:
Glycine max, vigor, germinación, malezas, rendimiento de granoResumen
Seed physiological quality significantly affects crop performance. Besides proper crop establishment, pre-emergence herbicides constitute one major weed-control strategy. This study evaluated selectivity of pre-emergence herbicides in soybean sown with seeds of high and low physiological quality. The experiment was conducted in Rio Verde, Brazil, in a 4x2 randomized block design, with four replications. The treatments consisted of low and high-quality seeds combined with pre-emergence herbicides [imazethapyr + flumioxazin], diclosulam and [sulfentrazone + diuron], and a control. Plants from high-quality seeds showed better performance than those grown from low-quality seeds. This resulted in a greater emergence speed index, plant height, inter-row cover, NDVI, plant population, first pod height, thousand-grain weight, and grain yield. Regardless of seed quality, pre-emergence herbicides did not influence the evaluated traits.
Highlights:
- The physiological quality of seeds affects the phytotechnical performance of soybean crop.
- There are no studies on the use of pre-emergence herbicides in soybean of different seed qualities.
- Selective herbicides were applied in the field in the pre-emergence stage, associated with seeds of high and low physiological quality.
- The herbicides [sulfentrazone + diuron], diclosulam, and [imazethapyr + flumioxazin] did not influence the evaluated characteristics, regardless of the physiological quality of the seeds.
- Plants from seeds of high physiological quality improve emergence, growth, productive yield, and grain yield, regardless of the herbicide.
Descargas
Citas
Asami, H.; Tachibana, M.; Homma K. 2021. Chemical and cultural control of Ipomoea hederácea var. integriuscula in narrow-row soybean in southwestern Japan. Weed Biology and Management. 21(3): 135-145. DOI: 10.1111/wbm.12232
Asher, B. S.; Dotray, P. A.; Liebl, R. A.; Keeling, J. W.; Ritchie, G. D.; Udeigwe, T. K.; Reed J. D.; Keller, K. E.; Bowe, S. J.; Aldridge, R. B.; Simon, A. 2021. Vertical mobility and cotton tolerance to trifludimoxazin, a new protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicide, in three West Texas soils. Weed Technology. 35(1): 144-148. DOI: 10.1017/wet.2020.95
Caverzan, A.; Giacomin, R.; Müller, M.; Biazus, C.; Lângaro, N. C.; Chavarria, G. 2018. How does seed vigor affect soybean yield components? Agronomy Journal. 110(4): 318-1327. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2017.11.0670
Cieslik, L. F.; Vidal, R. A.; Trezzi, M. M. 2014. Fomesafen toxicity to bean plants as a function of the time of application and herbicide dose. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy. 36(3): 329-334. DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v36i3.17630
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB). 2025. Acompanhamento de safra brasileira: grãos, décimo primeiro levantamento, safra 2024/25. CONAB. 12(11): 85-89.
Dias, M. A. N.; Pinto, T. L. F.; Mondo, V. H. V.; Cicero, S. M.; Pedrini, L. G. 2011. Direct effects of soybean seed vigor on weed competition. Revista Brasileira de Sementes. 33(2): 346-351. DOI: 10.1590/S0101-31222011000200017
Domergue, J. B.; Abadie, C.; Limani, A.; Way, D.; Tcherkez, G. 2019. Seed quality and carbon primary metabolism. Plant, Cell & Environment. 42(10): 2776-2788. DOI: 10.1111/pce.13618
Ebone, L. A.; Caverzan, A.; Tagliari, A.; Chiomento, J. L. T.; Silveira, D. C.; Chavarria, G. 2020. Soybean seed vigor: uniformity and growth as key factors to improve yield. Agronomy. 10(4): 545. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10040545
Ethridge, S.; Post, A.; Devkota, P.; Mulvaney, M.; Leon, R. 2021. Characterisation of carinata tolerance to select herbicides using field dose-response studies. Weed Technology. 35(6): 957-966. DOI: 10.1017/wet.2021.57
Ferreira, D. F. 2019. Sisvar: A computer analysis system to fixed effects splitplot type designs. Brazilian Journal of Biometrics. 37(4): 529-535. DOI: 10.28951/rbb.v37i4.450
França, E. E.; Silva, G. C.; Araújo, M. E. V.; Teixeira, I. R.; Corrêa, P. C.; Silva, A. G. 2021. Agronomic and physiological characteristics of soybean cultivars and their seeds according to plant population. Agronomía Colombiana. 39(2): 177-186. DOI: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n2.93019.
França-Neto, J. B.; Krzyzanowski, F. C.; Costa, N. P. 1998. The tetrazolium test for soybean seeds. Embrapa Soja. 71 p.
Gannon, T. W.; Hixson, A. C.; Keller, K. E.; Weber, J. B.; Knezevic, S. Z.; Yelverton, F. H. 2014. Soil properties influence saflufenacil phytotoxicity. Weed Science. 62(4): 657-663. DOI: 10.1614/WS-D-13-00171.1
Ghersa, C. M.; Holt, J. S. 1995. Using phenology prediction in weed management: a review. Weed Research. 35(6): 461-470. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1995.tb01643.x
Ghirardello, G. A.; Araújo, L. S.; Bacchin, L. C.; Dotta, M. A.; Souza, R. O.; Silva, A. F. M.; Silva, G. S.; Victoria Filho, R. 2021. Selectivity index of indaziflam to sugarcane cv. IACSP95-5000 in two soil textures. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. 74(2): 9531-9539. DOI: 10.15446/rfnam.v74n2.92423
Henning, A. F.; Mertz, M. L.; Jacob, E. A. J.; Dorneles, M.; Ronei, G. F.; Dejalma, P. Z. 2010. Composição química e mobilização de reservas em sementes de soja de alto e baixo vigor. Bragantia. 69(3): 727-733. DOI: 10.1590/S0006-87052010000300026
Lima, G. C.; Silva, M. L. N.; Curil, N.; Silva, M. A.; Oliveira, A. H.; Avanzi, J. C.; Ummus, M. E. 2013. Avaliação
da cobertura vegetal pelo índice de vegetação por diferença normalizada (IVDN). Ambiente & Água. 8(2): 204-214. DOI: 10.4136/ambi-agua.959
Maguire, J. D. 1962. Speed of germination-aid in selection and evaluation for seedling emergence and vigor. Crop Science. 2(1): 176-177. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183X000200020033x
Meneguzzo, M. R. R.; Meneghello, G. E.; Nadal, A. P.; Xavier, F. M.; Dellagostin, S. M.; Carvalho, I. R.; Gonçalves, V. P.; Lautenchleger, F.; Lângaro, N. C. 2021. Seedling length and soybean seed vigor. Ciência Rural. 51(7): e20190495. DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20190495
Mueller, C. T.; Boswell, B. W.; Mueller, S. S.; Steckei, L. E. 2014. Dissipation of fomesafen, saflufenacil, sulfentrazone, and flumioxazin from a Tennessee soil under field conditions. Weed Science. 62(4): 664-671. DOI: 10.1614/WS-D-13-00183.1
Pacanoski, Z.; Mehemeti, A. 2021. Efficacy and selectivity of pre-em herbicide on dependence of soil types and precipitation in sunflower crop. Agraarteadus: Journal of Agricultural Science. 32(1): 100-110. DOI: 10.15159/jas.21.08
Pino, M.; Schuch, L. O. B.; Castellanos, C. I. S.; Koch, F.; Szareski, V. J.; Pimentel, J. R.; Troyjack, C.; Carvalho, I. R.; Martins, A. B. N.; Silva, F. L.; Peter, M.; Monteiro, M. A.; Demari, G. H.; Aumonde, T. Z.; Pedó, T. 2019. Individual and population behavior of soybean plants grown in rows with different proportions of high-and low-vigor seeds. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 13(1): 151-158. DOI: 10.21475/ajcs.19.13.01.p1044
Procópio, S. O.; Silva, A. A.; Santos, J. B.; Araújo, E. F.; Ribeiro Jr., J. I.; Ferreira, L. R. 2002. Efeito do envelhecimento artificial de sementes sobre a tolerância do feijão ao S-metolachlor, em baixa temperatura. Revista Ceres. 49(284): 353-367. DOI: 10.7824/rbh.v2i3.362
Ribeiro, V. H. V.; Maia, L. G. S.; Arneson, N. J.; Oliveira, M. C.; Read, H. W.; Ané, J. M.; Santos, J. B.; Werle R. 2021. Influence of pre-emergence herbicides on soybean development, root nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Crop Protection. 144(1): 105576. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105576
Rossi, R. F.; Cavariani, C.; França-Neto, J. B. 2017. Vigor de sementes, população de plantas e desempenho agronômico de soja. Revista de Ciências Agrárias. 60(3): 215-222. DOI: 10.4322/rca.2239
Rüdell, E. C.; Petrolli, I. D. S.; Santos, F. M.; Frandaloso, D.; Silva, D. R. O. 2021. Weed interference capacity on soybean yield. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. 74(2): 9541-9547. DOI: 10.15446/rfnam.v74n2.89705
Sanchotene, D. M.; Dornelles, S. H. B.; Bolzan, T. M.; Vos, H. M.; Escobar, O. S.; Leon, C. B.; Muller, E. N.; Shimóia, E. P. 2017. Desempenho de diferentes herbicidas pré-emergentes para controle de Euphorbia heterophylla na cultura da soja. Perspectiva. 41(155): 7-15.
Seixas, C. D. S.; Neumaier, N.; Balbinot, Jr., A. A.; Krzyzanwski, F. C.; Leite, R. M. V. B. C. 2020. Tecnologias de produção de soja: região Central do Brasil. Londrina. Embrapa Soja. 347 p.
Shapiro, S. S.; Wilk, M. B. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete sample). Biometrika. 52(3): 591-611.
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD). 1995. Procedimentos para instalação, avaliação e análise de experimentos com herbicidas. SBCPD. 42 p.
Viger, P. R.; Eberlein, C. V.; Fuerst, E. P. 1991. Influence of available soil water content, temperature, and CGA-154281 on metolachlor injury to corn. Weed Science. 39(2): 227-231.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan las Políticas Editoriales.
RevFCAUNCuyo
.jpg)
