The Political Ecology of an Emerging Paradigm Shift: International Agricultural Research Institutions and Agroecology in Africa

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.40.093

Keywords:

Africa, agriculture, agroecology, food security, research infrastructure

Abstract

In the face of growing food insecurity on the African continent, it is clear that conventional agricultural paradigms have not moved the dial on malnutrition. Within international organizations and via grass roots social movements, agroecology is increasingly discussed as an alternative, low external input approach to agricultural intensification and food security. Nonetheless, while the science of agroecology is several decades old, it remains highly marginalized within most agricultural research institutions at the international, regional and national scales which overwhelmingly support productionist approaches to agricultural development. This paper explores two questions. First, how does the existing international and regional research architecture support and reinforce the conventional agricultural development paradigm in Africa? Second, how do new agricultural development paradigms emerge and gain traction within development institutions? The findings are based on field level observations and time spent within different agricultural research organizations. I conclude that research infrastructure is political, an insight that is consistent with political agronomy and political ecology. Furthermore, I argue that meaningful change on the ground requires a change in research infrastructure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

William G. Moseley, Macalester College

Profesor DeWitt Wallace de Geografía y Director del Programa de Alimentación, Agricultura y Sociedad en Macalester College. Su investigación y docencia se centran en la geografía de las relaciones naturaleza-sociedad, la ecología política, el cambio agrario, los sistemas alimentarios y la geografía del desarrollo. Es autor de 12 libros, así como de más de 100 artículos revisados por pares y capítulos de libros. Actualmente se desempeña como presidente de la American Association of Geographers y anteriormente integró el Panel de Alto Nivel de Expertos sobre Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición de la United Nations.

References

Andersson, J., & Sumberg, J. (2016). Knowledge politics in development-oriented agronomy. Introductory paper prepared for the conference Contested Agronomy, Institute of Development Studies (IDS), Brighton, UK.

Bebbington, A., & Carney, J. (1990). Geography in the international agricultural research centers: Theoretical and practical concerns. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 80(1), 34–48.

Bezner Kerr, R. (2020). Agroecology as a means to transform the food system. Landbauforschung, 70, 77-82.

Canfield, M., Anderson, M. D., & McMichael, P. (2021). UN Food Systems Summit 2021: Dismantling democracy and resetting corporate control of food systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 103.

Carney, J. (1993). Converting the wetlands, engendering the environment: The intersection of gender with agrarian change in The Gambia. Economic Geography, 69(4), 329–348.

Clapp, J., Moseley, W. G., Burlingame, B., & Termine, P. (2022). The case for a six-dimensional food security framework. Food Policy, 106, 102164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102164

Clapp, J., Moseley, W. G., Termine, P., & Burlingame, B. (2025). Multi-scalar policy uptake of the six-dimensional food security framework. Food Policy, 137, 102936.

Clapp, J., Lehmann, B., Moseley, W., Elver, H., & Webb, P. (2023). The I-TrACE principles for legitimate food systems science-policy-society interfaces. Nature Food, 4, 128–129.

Committee on World Food Security (CFS). (2021). Policy recommendations for agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/cfs/Docs2021/Documents/Policy_Recommendations_Agroecology_other_Innovations/2021_Agroecological_and_other_innovations_EN.pdf

Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). (2022). CGIAR’s agroecology initiative: Transforming food, land, and water systems across the Global South. https://www.cgiar.org/news-events/news/cgiars-agroecology-initiative-transforming-food-land-and-water-systems-across-the-global-south/

Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). (2023a). Research centers. https://www.cgiar.org/research/research-centers/

Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). (2023b). CGIAR financial report dashboards. https://www.cgiar.org/food-security-impact/finance-reports/dashboard/center-analysis/

De Schutter, O. (2014). The reform of the Committee on World Food Security: The quest for coherence in global governance. In Rethinking food systems: Structural challenges, new strategies and the law (pp. 219–238).

Duncan, J. (2016). Governing in a postpolitical era: Civil society participation for improved food security governance. In Advances in food security and sustainability (Vol. 1, pp. 137–161). Elsevier.

Eklin, K., Evensmo, I. F., Georgescu, I., Hubert, V., Le, J., Malik, T., Treyer, S., & Brun, M. (2014). The Committee on World Food Security reform: Impacts on global governance of food security (IDDRI Working Paper). https://hal.science/hal-01620862/document

Gianinazzi, W. (2018). Penser global, agir local: Histoire d’une idée. EcoRev’, 46(1), 19–30.

HLPE-FSN. (2019). Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. https://www.fao.org/3/ca5602en/ca5602en.pdf

HLPE-FSN. (2020). Food security and nutrition: Building a global narrative towards 2030 (Report No. 15). https://www.fao.org/3/ca9731en/ca9731en.pdf

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). AR6 synthesis report: Climate change 2023. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/

Gomez, B., & Jones III, J. P. (Eds.). (2010). Research methods in geography: A critical introduction. John Wiley & Sons.

Kaboré, R., Coumaré, O., Traoré, N.T., Kouakou, P.K., Raboin, L.M., Vaksmann, M., Diop, A., Diouf, I., Ndiaye, A., Ngom, B. and Lo, S. (2025). Les systèmes techniques innovants d'intensification agroécologique. Recueil d'innovations testées au Burkina Faso, au Mali et au Sénégal, dans le cadre du programme FAIR Sahel (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/614483/1/Guide%20Fair%20-%20Syst%C3%A8mes%20techniques%20innovants%2009.pdf).

Leach, M., & Mearns, R. (1996). The lie of the land: Challenging received wisdom on the African environment. The International Africa Institute.

Loconto, A. M., & Fouilleux, E. (2019). Defining agroecology: Exploring the circulation of knowledge in FAO’s global dialogue. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 25(2), 116–137.

Madden, A., MacInnis, J., & Yanes, N. M. (2024). Advocating for food sovereignty in the UN Committee on World Food Security: Facilitating young people’s participation in policy making. In Research handbook on the sociology of youth (pp. 268–285). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Montenegro de Wit, M., Canfield, M., Iles, A., Anderson, M., McKeon, N., Guttal, S., & Prato, S. (2021). Resetting power in global food governance: The UN Food Systems Summit. Development, 64, 153–161.

Moseley, W. G. (2017). One step forward, two steps back in farmer knowledge exchange: “Scaling up” as Fordist replication in drag. In Agronomy for development (pp. 79–90). Routledge.

Moseley, W. G. (2021, September 28). Inclusive science must follow the UN Food Systems Summit. Al Jazeera English. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/9/28/to-end-hunger-we-must-return-to-participatory-science

Moseley, W. G. (2022). Development assistance and Boserupian intensification under geopolitical isolation: The political ecology of a crop-livestock integration project in Burundi. Geoforum, 128, 276–285.

Moseley, W. G. (2024). Decolonizing African agriculture: Food security, agroecology and the need for radical transformation. Agenda Publishing.

Munro, W., & Schurman, R. (2022). Building an ideational and institutional architecture for Africa’s agricultural transformation. African Studies Review, 65(1), 16–40.

NEPAD/CAADP. (2023). Introducing the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme.

Patel, R. (2013). The long green revolution. Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(1), 1–63.

Place, F., Niederle, P., Sinclair, F., Carmona, N. E., Guéneau, S., Gitz, V., Alpha, A., Sabourin, E., & Hainzelin, E. (2022). Agroecologically-conducive policies: A review of recent advances and remaining challenges (Working Paper No. 1).

Robbins, P. (2019). Political ecology: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Schurman, R. (2018). Micro (soft) managing a “green revolution” for Africa: The new donor culture and international agricultural development. World Development, 112, 180–192.

Vanloquerin, G. y P.V. Baret. (2009). “How Agricultural Research Systems Shape a Technological Regime that Develops Genetic Engineering but Locks out Agroecological Innovations.” Research Policy. 38(6): 971-983.

von Braun, J., & Kalkuhl, M. (2015). International science and policy interaction for improved food and nutrition security (ZEF Working Paper No. 142).

von Braun, J., Afsana, K., Fresco, L. O., & Hassan, M. H. A. (2023). Science for transformation of food systems: Opportunities for the UN Food Systems Summit. Springer.

Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 503–515.

Published

01-07-2026

How to Cite

Moseley, W. G. (2026). The Political Ecology of an Emerging Paradigm Shift: International Agricultural Research Institutions and Agroecology in Africa. Boletín e studios Geográficos, (125), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.40.093

Issue

Section

Dossier