Neo-liberal Green Grabbing and Green Washing in Minas Gerais, Brazil

The Case of Ibitipoca

Authors

  • Scott William Hoefle Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  • Vicente Paulo dos Santos Pinto Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-0822

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.40.094

Keywords:

neo-liberal conservation policy, green grabbing, green washing, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Abstract

The neo-liberal turn of Brazilian conservation policy after 1990 is questioned using critical concepts from political ecology and environmental history perspectives: carbon colonialism, green grabbing, urban exploitation of the rural in the form of bio-centric nature enclosures and green washing unsustainable activities through green talk and environmental compensation. These issues are illustrated in an example of a large private nature reserve in Minas Gerais, perhaps the most environmentally blighted of Brazilian states after centuries of mining activities. 21st Century global political ecology methods are used to locally, regionally, nationally and globally contextualize the case study researched in fieldwork undertaken in 2023 in the locality of Ibitipoca, situated in a High Mountain enclave located within the Atlantic Forest biome of the state. Decades of prior research in different Brazilian biomes and regions are mobilized to demonstrate how the large private nature reserve displays all the hallmarks of green grabbing, green washing and elitist eco-tourism. The case also presents a Brazilian example of what Latour (2018) called the elitist bunker/gated community mentality involving Local-minus faux traditionalism in which elites opt out of Global-plus modernization and limit the scope and scale of reparations for environmental destruction perpetrated elsewhere by creating specific green havens for their own personal use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Scott William Hoefle, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

D.Phil. (University of Oxford, Reino Unido), Profesor Titular del Programa de Posgrado en Geografía, Instituto de Geociencias, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

Vicente Paulo dos Santos Pinto, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

Ph.D. (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Profesor Titular del Departamento de Geociencias, Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brasil.

References

Adams, W. M., & Mulligan, M. (2003). Decolonizing nature: Strategies for conservation in a post-colonial era. Earthscan.

BBC. (2019). Brazil's Barão de Cocais waits as dam nearby at risk of collapse. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-48391767

Bicalho, A. M. S. M., & Araujo, A. P. C. (2021). Alternative agro-ecological stock-raising in the Pantanal wetlands of western Brazil. Belgeo, 2021(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.48485

Bicalho, A. M., & Hoefle, S. W. (2022). Conservation and dispossession in the Pantanal wetland of western Brazil. En H. Pina, F. Martins, & A. Rocha (Eds.), The overarching issues of the European area (pp. 202–221). Universidade do Porto.

Boyle, P., & Halfacree, K. (Eds.). (1998). Migration into rural areas. Wiley.

Bumpus, A. G., & Liverman, D. M. (2011). Carbon colonialism? En R. Peet, P. Robbins, & M. Watts (Eds.), Global political ecology (pp. 203–224). Routledge.

Büscher, B., & Davidov, V. (Eds.). (2014). The ecotourism-extraction nexus. Routledge.

Büscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2014). Accumulation by conservation. New Political Economy, 20(2), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2014.923824

Büscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2018). Under pressure: Conceptualising political ecologies of green wars. Conservation and Society, 16(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_18_1

DATALUTA. (2026). Base de dados da luta pela terra. https://basedosdados.org/dataset/7f67f9bf-7a6b-4268-acb7-7c677c50c232

Dean, W. (1995). With broadaxe and firebrand. University of California Press.

Diegues, A. C. (1996). O mito moderno da natureza intocada. São Paulo: NUPAUB-USP

Dowie, M. (2009). Conservation refugees. MIT Press.

Durham, W. H. (2008). The challenge ahead. En A. Stronza & W. H. Durham (Eds.), Ecotourism and conservation in the Americas (pp. 265–271). CABI.

Fernandes, B. M. (2000). A formação do MST no Brasil. Editora Vozes.

Fielding, A. J. (1990). Counterurbanisation: Threat or blessing? En D. Pinder (Ed.), Western Europe (pp. 226–239). Wiley. (Trabajo original publicado en 1980)

Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical political ecology. Routledge.

Griffin, C. J., Jones, R., & Robertson, I. J. M. (Eds.). (2019). Moral ecologies. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hoefle, S. W. (1992). Fishing, tourism and industrial development in Southeast Brazil. En M. Agüero (Ed.), Contribuciones al estudio de la pesca en América Latina (pp. 70–91). ICLARM.

Hoefle, S. W. (2013). Beyond carbon colonialism. Critique of Anthropology, 33(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X13478224

Hoefle, S. W. (2014). Fishing livelihoods, seashore tourism and industrial development in coastal Rio de Janeiro. Geographical Research, 52(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12061

Hoefle, S. W. (2016). Multi-functionality, juxtaposition and conflict in the Central Amazon. Journal of Rural Studies, 44, 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.009

Hoefle, S. W. (2019). Ghosts in the forest: The moral ecology of environmental governance toward poor farmers. En C. J. Griffin, R. Jones, & I. J. M. Robertson (Eds.), Moral ecologies (pp. 99–125). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06112-8_5

Hoefle, S. W. (2020a). Conservation refugees and environmental dispossession in 21st century critical geography. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, (84), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.21138/bage.2895

Hoefle, S. W. (2020b). The uncertain future of identity politics and conservation policy in the Brazilian Amazon. En J. Daniels (Ed.), Advances in environmental research (Vol. 70, pp. 55–101). Nova Science.

Hoefle, S. W. (2021). Is the land half empty or half full of forest? En H. Pina, F. Martins, & L. D. Oliveira (Eds.), The overarching issues in the European area (Vol. 15, pp. 369–389). Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto.

Holifield, R. (2015). Environmental justice and political ecology. En T. Perreault, G. Bridge, & J. McCarthy (Eds.), Routledge handbook of political ecology (pp. 585–597). Routledge.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). (2025). Juiz de Fora. https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/mg/juiz-de-fora/panorama

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). (2026). Biomas brasileiros. https://educa.ibge.gov.br/jovens/conheca-o-brasil/territorio/18307-biomas-brasileiros.html

Huber, M. (2017). Industrializing political ecology. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(1), 151–166.

Jacoby, K. (2014). Crimes against nature: Squatters, poachers, thieves. University of California Press.

Jones, J. P., Marston, S. A., & Woodward, K. (2011). Scales and networks Part II. En J. A. Agnew & J. S. Duncan (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to human geography (pp. 404–414). Blackwell.

Kelly-Reif, K., & Wing, S. (2016). Urban-rural exploitation. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.010

Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth (C. Porter, Trad.). Polity Press. (Trabajo original publicado en 2017)

Library of Congress. (2024). Homestead Strike: Topics in chronicling America. https://guides.loc.gov/chronicling-america-homestead-strike

Marston, S. A., Woodward, K., & Jones, J. P. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00180.x

Merchant, C. (2004). Radical ecology. Routledge.

Moreira, A. (2011). Frota de veículos cresce 119% em dez anos no Brasil. G1 Auto Esporte. http://g1.globo.com/carros/noticia/2011/02/frota-de-veiculos-cresce-119-3m-dez-anos-no-brasil-aponta-denatran.html

Murdoch, J. (2006). Networking rurality. En P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 171–184). Sage.

Neumann, R. P. (2009). Political ecology: Theorizing scale. Progress in Human Geography, 33(3), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508096353

Neumann, R. P. (2015). Political ecology of scale. En R. L. Bryant (Ed.), International handbook of political ecology (pp. 475–486). Edward Elgar.

Peet, R., Robbins, P., & Watts, M. (Eds.). (2011). Global political ecology. Routledge.

Pepper, D. (1996). A history of environmental thought. Routledge.

Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2024). CO₂ emissions. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions

Ritchie, H., Rosado, P., & Roser, M. (2023). CO₂ and greenhouse gas emissions. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-share-of-co2-emissions

SOS Mata Atlântica. (2025). A Mata Atlântica é a floresta mais devastada do Brasil. https://www.sosma.org.br/causas/mata-atlantica

Taylor, M. (2015). The political ecology of climate change adaptation. Earthscan.

Tribuna de Minas. (2024). Governo reduz teto de Minha Casa, Minha Vida. https://tribunademinas.com.br/noticias/economia/03-07-2017/governo-reduz-teto-do-minha-casa-minha-vida.html

Wilson, G. A. (2007). Multifunctional agriculture. CABI.

Wilson, G. A., & Burton, R. J. F. (2015). Neo-productivist agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 38, 52–64.

WP Travel. (2024). Most visited countries in the world in 2023. https://wptravel.io/most-visited-countries-in-the-world/#h-most-visited-countries-in-the-world-in-2023

Downloads

Published

01-07-2026

How to Cite

Hoefle, S. W., & dos Santos Pinto, V. P. (2026). Neo-liberal Green Grabbing and Green Washing in Minas Gerais, Brazil: The Case of Ibitipoca. Boletín e studios Geográficos, (125), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.40.094

Issue

Section

Dossier