Freedom for Whom?

A Study in Brazilian Swinging Houses

Authors

  • Luiz Alex Silva Saraiva Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5307-9750
  • Elisângela de Jesus Furtado da Silva Fundación Dom Cabral

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.48.071

Keywords:

Swinging, Swinging houses, Sexual practices, Sexuality

Abstract

In this article the proposal is to discuss the propagated sexual freedom in the practice of swinging. For this, an ethnography was carried out in two swinging houses in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The main contributions of this work are twofold: first, to humanize research practices, in which ethnography plays a central role, as it allows immersion in the context and contact with people to show researchers that their role is less to judge other people's lives than to try to understand them within human differences. And second, as for the freedom proclaimed, it is not as full as proposed, being different between women, who submit themselves to the situation, reproducing what they live in society, and men, who direct and control the whole process, as allowed to them by the patriarchy under which we all live.

Author Biographies

Luiz Alex Silva Saraiva, Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais

Doctor en Administración por la Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Profesor Asociado en la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais, Brasil.

Elisângela de Jesus Furtado da Silva, Fundación Dom Cabral

Doctora en Administración por la Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Profesora en la Fundación Dom Cabral, Brasil.

References

Baumeister, R. F. & Twenge, J. M. Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6(2), 166-203.

Bergstrand, C. & Williams, B. (2000). Today’s alternative marriage styles: the case of swingers. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 3. Recuperado em 29, setembro, 2020 de: http://www.ejhs.org/volume3/swing/body.htm.

Carroll, J. L. (2010). Sexuality now: embracing diversity (3th ed). Belmont: Wadsworth.

Colomina, B. (Ed.) (1992). Sexuality & space. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.

Corrêa, S., Petchesky, R., & Parker, R. Sexuality, health and human rights. Abingdon Routledge.

Devides, M. B. C. (2020). Variáveis associadas ao ciúme: um estudo de revisão bibliográfica. In O. M. Rodrigues Jr., C. Zeglio, V. L. Vacari, & G. E. Levatti (Orgs.). Estudos em sexualidade: volume 2 (pp. 237-272). São Paulo: InPaSex.

Diniz, M. Z. A prática de swing entre casais heterossexuais: uma revisão de literatura. In O. M. Rodrigues Jr., C. Zeglio, V. L. Vacari, & G. E. Levatti (Orgs.). Estudos em sexualidade: volume 2 (pp. 317-336). São Paulo: InPaSex.

Escamila, R. (2015). History of swinging. Limité Magazine. Recuperado em 17, abril 2019 de: http://limitemagazine.com/2009/04/history-of-swinging/.

Fassin, D. & Memmi, D. (Dirs.) (2004). Le gouvernement des corps. Paris: Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales.

Frank, K. (2008). ‘Not gay, but not homophobic’: male sexuality and homophobia in the ‘lifestyle’. Sexualities, 11(4), 435-454.

Gagnon, (2004). An interpretation of desire: essays in the study of sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Herzog. D. (2011). Sexuality in Europe: a twentieth-century history. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Knopp, L. (1995). Sexuality and urban space: a framework for analysis. In Bell, D. & Valentine, G. (Eds.). Mapping desire: geographies of sexuality (pp. 136-146). London: Routledge.

Lubianco, G. (2017). Preconceito e discriminação em casa de swing. Reclame Aqui. Recuperado em 20, novembro 2019 de: https://www.reclameaqui.com.br/swing-club-bh_193144/preconceito-e-discriminacao-em-casa-de-swing_KNmxJQYPrK6_X0RA/.

Luibhéid, E. (1998). Entry denied: controlling sexuality at the border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Okami, P. (2002). Dear diary: a useful but imperfect method. In M. W. Wiederman & B. E. Whitley, Jr. (Eds). Handbook for conducting research on human sexuality (pp. 195-208). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Oliveira, A. M. A. & Pocahy, F. A. (2015). Eu, tu, ele(s), ela(s): cartografando heteroconjugalidades na prática do swing. Fractal: Revista de Psicologia, 27(3), 228-237

Salem press (2011). Exploring human sexuality. Amenia: Salem Press.

Silvério, M. (2014a). Swing em Portugal: uma interpretação antropológica da troca de casais. Etnográfica, 18(3), 551-574.

Silvério, M. (2014b). Gênero, sexualidade e swing: a ressignificação de valores através da troca de casais. Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad – Revista Latinoamericana, 18, 111-139.

Van Campenhoudt, L. (2008). Approche relationnelle du risque et de la transgression dans les relations sexuelles In: Y. Cartuyvels (Dir.). Les ambivalences du risque: regards croisés en sciences sociales (pp. 269-280). Bruxelles : Presses de l’Université Saint-Louis.

Viwatpanich, K. (2010). Swinging: extramarital sexuality in Thai society. Anthropological Notebooks, 16(2), 57-70.

Von Der Weid, O. (2012). A prática do swing e a dimensão do prazer. Temáticas, Campinas, 20(40), 1-32.

Von Der Weid, O. (2010). Swing, o adultério consentido. Estudos Feministas, 18(3), 789-810.

Von Der Weid, O. (2009). Masculino e feminino na prática do swing. Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad – Revista Latinoamericana, 3, 106-129.

Wagner, B. (2009). Becoming a sexual being: overcoming constraints on female sexuality. Sexualities, 12(3), 289-311.

Weeks, J. (1985). Sexuality and its discontents meanings, myths & modern sexualities. New York: Rotledge.

Westheimer, R. K. (2004). Human sexuality: a psychosocial perspective (2th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Woods, G. (1995). Fantasy islands: popular topographies of marooned masculinity. In Bell, D. & Valentine, G. (Eds.). Mapping desire: geographies of sexuality (pp. 115-135). London: Routledge.

Published

15-12-2023

How to Cite

Saraiva, L. A. S., & Furtado da Silva, E. de J. (2023). Freedom for Whom? A Study in Brazilian Swinging Houses. Estudios Sociales Contemporáneos, (30), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.48.071