Contribuições da Hermenêutica Ricoueriana na Análise do Discurso
Ricoeur’s Contribution to Discourse Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.48.095Palavras-chave:
hermenêutica ricoeuriana, análise do discurso, ontologia, epistemologia, estudos organizacionaisResumo
A análise do discurso tornou-se um profícuo campo nos estudos organizacionais. Enquanto alguns reconhecem facilmente o discurso como um dos mais expressivos fenômenos organizacionais contemporâneos, outros consideram que os seus aspectos onto-epistemológicos e teórico-metodológicos carecem de consistência: o discurso é visto como conceitualmente frágil, podendo significar virtualmente qualquer coisa que o pesquisador queira lhe atribuir; é epistemologicamente frágil, sendo assumido como puro refletor de uma realidade ou como seu construtor universal; constrói falsas percepções de que é uma forma simplista de se acessar e de se compreender a realidade de forma puramente objetiva. Neste artigo, confrontamos essas afirmações propondo a hermenêutica ricoeuriana como alternativa onto-epistemológica para a análise do discurso. Desenvolvemos uma visão ampla da hermenêutica a partir de seus aspectos filosóficos fundamentais que mostra suas fortes conexões com o discurso, e demonstramos como, na hermenêutica de Ricoeur, os conceitos mais elementares estão intimamente ligados aos aspectos filosóficos subjacentes do discurso enquanto objeto de estudo. Por fim, explicamos como a hermenêutica ricoeurians pode ser uma epistemologia para a análise do discurso.
Referências
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Taking the Linguistic Turn in Organizational Research: Challenges, Responses, Consequences. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(2), 136-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886300362002
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations through Discourse Analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539002
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2011). Decolonializing discourse: Critical reflections on organizational discourse analysis. Human Relations, 64(9), 1121-1146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711408629
Bendl, R. (2008), Gender Subtexts – Reproduction of Exclusion in Organizational Discourse. British Journal of Management, 19: S50-S64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00571.x
Bergström, O., & Knights, D. (2006). Organizational discourse and subjectivity: Subjectification during processes of recruitment. Human Relations, 59(3), 351-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706064179
van Bommel, K., & Spicer, A. (2011). Hail the Snail: Hegemonic Struggles in the Slow Food Movement. Organization Studies, 32(12), 1717-1744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611425722
Curtis, R. (2014). Foucault beyond Fairclough: From Transcendental to Immanent Critique in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 35(12), 1753-1772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614546150
Doolin, B. (2002). Enterprise Discourse, Professional Identity and the Organizational Control of Hospital Clinicians. Organization Studies, 23(3), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602233003
Driver, M. (2007). Reviewer Feedback as Discourse of the Other: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on the Manuscript Review Process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(4), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492607310982
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2005). Peripheral Vision: Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism. Organization Studies, 26(6), 915-939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054610
Fairhurst, G. T. (2004). Textuality and Agency in Interaction Analysis. Organization, 11(3), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041996
Faria, J. H. de. (2016). Análise de Discurso em Estudos Organizacionais: as concepções de Pêcheux e Bakhtin. Teoria e Prática Em Administração, 5(2), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.21714/2238-104X2015v5i2-26399
Frawley W. Norman Fairclough, Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity, 1992. Pp. vii + 259. Language in Society. 1993;22(3):421-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017309
Gadamer, H. G. (1975 [1960]). Truth and Method. New York: Seabury Press.
Golant, B. D., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). The Constitution of Organizational Legitimacy: A Narrative Perspective. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1149-1167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607075671
Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., Phillips, N., & Putnam, L. (2004). Handbook of Organizational Discourse. (Eds.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Halsall, R. (2009), The Discourse of Corporate Cosmopolitanism. British Journal of Management, 20: S136-S148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00637.x
Hardy, C. (2004). Scaling up and Bearing Down in Discourse Analysis: Questions Regarding Textual Agencies and Their Context. Organization, 11(3), 415-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404042000
Hardy, C., & Grant, D. (2012). Readers beware: Provocation, problematization and … problems. Human Relations, 65(5), 547-566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711435181
Hardy, C. & Thomas, R. (2014), Strategy, Discourse and Practice. Journal of Management Studies, 51: 320-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12005
Hardy, C. and Thomas, R. (2015), Discourse in a Material World. Journal of Management Studies, 52: 680-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12113
Heidegger, M. (1996 [1953]). Being and Time: A Translation of Sein und Zeit. New York: State University of New York Press.
Höglund, L., & Svärdsten, F. (2018). Strategy work in the public sector—A balancing act of competing discourses. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(3), 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.06.003
Holt, R., & Mueller, F. (2011). Wittgenstein, Heidegger and Drawing Lines in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 32(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610394299
Iedema, R., Degeling, P., Braithwaite, J., & White, L. (2004). ‘It’s an Interesting Conversation I’m Hearing’: The Doctor as Manager. Organization Studies, 25(1), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604038174
Josefsson, I., & Blomberg, A. (2020). Turning to the dark side: Challenging the hegemonic positivity of the creativity discourse. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36(1), 101088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101088
Kallio, T. J. (2007). Taboos in Corporate Social Responsibility Discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(2), 165–175. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075454
Leitch, S., & Palmer, I. (2010). Analysing Texts in Context: Current Practices and New Protocols for Critical Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1194-1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00884.x
Levi-Strauss, C. (2008 [1963]). Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books. 352pp.
Maguire, S. (1999). The Discourse of Control. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(1), 109–114. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074079
Marshak, R.J. and Grant, D. (2008), Organizational Discourse and New Organization Development Practices. British Journal of Management, 19: S7-S19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00567.x
Mengis, J., & Eppler, M. J. (2008). Understanding and Managing Conversations from a Knowledge Perspective: An Analysis of the Roles and Rules of Face-to-face Conversations in Organizations. Organization Studies, 29(10), 1287-1313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607086553
Michaud, V. (2017), "Words fly away, writings remain – paradoxes in and around documents: A methodological proposition", Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-07-2015-1298
Musson, G. and Duberley, J. (2007), Change, Change or Be Exchanged: The Discourse of Participation and the Manufacture of Identity. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 143-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00640.x
Nayak, A., & Beckett, A. (2008). Infantilized Adults or Confident Consumers? Enterprise Discourse in the UK Retail Banking Industry. Organization, 15(3), 407-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508408088537
Ogbor, J.O. (2000), Mythicizing and Reification in Entrepreneurial Discourse: Ideology-Critique of Entrepreneurial Studies. Journal of Management Studies, 37: 605-635. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00196
Orlikowski, W.J. and Scott, S.V. (2015), Exploring Material-Discursive Practices. Journal of Management Studies, 52: 697-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12114
Oppong, N.Y. (2017), "Evaluation of a management development programme: a critical discourse analysis", Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 68-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-05-2016-1381
Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983921
Putnam, L.L. (2015), The Discourse–Materiality Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 52: 706-716. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12115
Reynolds, M., Yuthas, K. (2008), Moral Discourse and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78: 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9316-x
Ricoeur, P. (1969). Le conflit des interprétations: Essais sur l’herméneutique. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian Press.
Ricoeur, P. (2003). The Rule of Metaphor: the creation of meaning in language. London and New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library, Routledge Classics.
Ricoeur, P. (2004 [1974]). The Conflict of Interpretations: essays in hermeneutics. Continuum: London, New York.
Ricoeur, P. (2016). Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: essays on language, action and interpretation. England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534984
Rudolph, K. (2006). The Linguistic Turn Revisited: On Time and Language. Differences, 17(2): 64-95. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2006-003
Saussure, F. (2011). Course in General Linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Segercrantz, B., Tuori, A. and Niemistö, C. (2021), "Health promotion in care organizations as material-discursive practices", Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 170-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1826
Smith, C., Valsecchi, R., Mueller, F., & Gabe, J. (2008). Knowledge and the discourse of labour process transformation: nurses and the case of NHS Direct for England. Work, Employment and Society, 22(4), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017008096737
Surkis, J. (2021). When Was the Linguistic Turn? A Genealogy. The American Historical Review, 117(3), 700–722, https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.117.3.700
Thompson, P., & Harley, B. (2012). Beneath the Radar? A Critical Realist Analysis of ‘The Knowledge Economy’ and ‘Shareholder Value’ as Competing Discourses. Organization Studies, 33(10), 1363-1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612457614
Vaara, E. and Whittle, A. (2022), Common Sense, New Sense or Non-Sense? A Critical Discursive Perspective on Power in Collective Sensemaking. Journal of Management Studies, 59: 755-781. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12783
Vaara, E, Tienari, J, Koveshnikov, A (2021) From cultural differences to identity politics: A critical discursive approach to national identity in multinational organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 58(8): 2052–2081. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12517
Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Laurila, J. (2006). Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6), 789-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606061071
van Dijk, T. (2001). Multidisciplinary Cda: a plea for diversity. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (1st ed., pp. 95-120). SAGE Publications, Ltd, https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020
Werner, M. D., & Cornelissen, J. P. (2014). Framing the Change: Switching and Blending Frames and their Role in Instigating Institutional Change. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1449-1472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614539314
Woodman, R. W. (2008). Discourse, Metaphor and Organizational Change: the wine is new, but the bottle is old. British Journal of Management, 19(suppl.n°1): 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00569.x
Zanoni, P., & Janssens, M. (2015). The Power of Diversity Discourses at Work: On the Interlocking Nature of Diversities and Occupations. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1463-1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615593584
