Language, the mind and everything

An interview with Professor Sydney Lamb

Authors

  • Paul Buzila University of Bucharest, Department of Romance Languages and Literatures, Classical Studies and Modern Greek https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2728-3787

Keywords:

Relational Network Theory, Neurocognitive linguistics, language structure, human cognition

Abstract

Research into how the brain organizes language has focused almost exclusively on the location of linguistic functions, leaving aside the more interesting questions of what happens in those locations and how linguistic information is represented. The reason for this is that questions about location are easier to address, through aphasiology and neuroimaging. However, there is abundant empirical evidence, both linguistic and neurological, that provides answers to the more fundamental questions. This evidence strongly supports a connectivist conception of linguistic information rather than a conception in which the brain stores symbols as such. Characterizations of language in terms of a repository of symbols are incompatible with neuroanatomical evidence and require impossible assumptions about how the brain works. In contrast, Relational Network Theory, which is one version of connectivism, provides an explanation of brain processes that is consistent not only with numerous details of cortical anatomy and function but also with quantitative estimates of cortical capacity.

Author Biography

Paul Buzila, University of Bucharest, Department of Romance Languages and Literatures, Classical Studies and Modern Greek

Lingüista estadounidense y creador de la Teoría de Redes Relacionales (Relational Network Theory), un modelo del lenguaje concebido como neurológicamente plausible. Obtuvo el doctorado en 1958 en la Universidad de California, Berkeley, donde impartió clases entre 1956 y 1964 y dirigió el Proyecto de Traducción Automática durante el mismo período. En 1964 se incorporó al cuerpo docente de la Universidad de Yale. Posteriormente, en 1977, pasó a formar parte del equipo de Semionics Associates en Berkeley, California.
En 1981 fue nombrado profesor de lingüística y semiótica en la Universidad Rice de Houston, donde en 1983 se le otorgó la cátedra Agnes Cullen Arnold en Lingüística y, en 1996, el título de profesor de Ciencias Cognitivas. Desde 1998 es profesor emérito de dicha universidad.
El trabajo del profesor Lamb abarca diversos campos, desde el estudio de las lenguas indígenas norteamericanas hasta la lingüística computacional y la traducción automática, con especial énfasis en los mecanismos neurocognitivos subyacentes al lenguaje. Su Teoría de Redes Relacionales sostiene que el sistema lingüístico, al igual que el sistema cognitivo en general, es puramente relacional, y que el procesamiento lingüístico consiste en la activación selectiva de rutas dentro de subredes interconectadas que forman parte de la red cognitiva global.

References

Chafe, W. (2000). Loci of diversity and convergence in thought and language. In M. Pütz and M. H. Verspoor (eds) Explorations in Linguistic Relativity. John Benjamins.

Churchland, P. and Sejnowski, T. (1992). The Computational Brain. MIT Press.

Damasio, A. (1989). The brain binds entities and events by multiregional activation from convergence zones. Neural Computation, 1, 123–32.

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam.

Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., Mehler, J., Cohen, I., Paulesu, E., et al. (1997). Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second language. NeuroReport, 8, 3809-3815.

Eggert, G. H. (1977). Wernicke’s Works on Aphasia: a sourcebook and review. Mouton.

Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.

Hjelmslev, L. [1943] (1961). Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, English translation by F. J. Whitfield (Originally published in Danish as Omkring Sprogteoriens Grundlæggelse by E. Munksgaard, Copenhagen), University of Wisconsin Press.

Hubel, D. and Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London), 160, 106–54.

Hubel, D. and Wiesel, T. N. (1977). Functional architecture of Macaque monkey cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 198, 1-559.

Kim, K. H. S., Relkin, N. R., Lee, K. M. and Hirsch, J. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 388, 171-4.

Lamb, S. M. (1966). Outline of Stratificational Grammar. Georgetown University Press.

Lamb, S. M. (1970). Linguistic and cognitive networks. In P. L. Garvin (ed.), Cognition: a multiple view, Spartan Books.

Lamb, S. M. (1999). Pathways of the Brain: the neurocognitive basis of language. Benjamins.

Lamb, S. M. (2000). Bidirectional processing in language and related cognitive systems. In M. Barlowe and S. Kemmer (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language, CSLI Publications.

Lamb, S. M. (2004). Language and Reality. Edited by J. Webster. Continuum.

Lederer, R. (1987). Anguished English. Dell Publishing.

Mountcastle, V. B. (1998) Perceptual Neuroscience: the cerebral cortex. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Müller, E-A. (2000). Valence and phraseology in stratificational linguistics. In D. G. Lockwood, P. H. Fries and J. E. Copeland (eds.), Functional Approaches to Language, Culture, and Cognition, Benjamins.

Papanicolaou, A. C. (1998). Fundamentals of Functional Brain Imaging: a guide to the methods and their applications to psychology and behavioral neuroscience. Swets and Zeitlinger.

Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct. Morrow.

Reich, P. (1985). Unintended puns. LACUS Forum, 11, 314–22.

Rizzolatti, G. and Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188-94.

Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. (1986) Parallel Distributed Processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. MIT Press.

Published

12-12-2025

How to Cite

Buzila, P. (2025). Language, the mind and everything: An interview with Professor Sydney Lamb. nales e Lingüística, (15), 31–53. etrieved from https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/analeslinguistica/article/view/9603

Issue

Section

Dossier