For An Inoperative Listening: Communities of Infancy in The Cracks Between Voices and Words
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.36.141Keywords:
voice, inoperative listening, community of philosophical inquiry, community of infancy, to bableAbstract
The word “infancy” encloses in its etymological origin the distancing between children and their voices. However, the voices of children are there: they happen every moment and they even surprise us with the social and political relevance of their interventions. This text builds on that perplexity, trying to retrieve distinct meanings for the “voice” (not only in a meaning derived from the word, understood as ‘participation’, but also in its literal sense as a set of sounds emitted by the vocal apparatus), in the context of the pedagogical and philosophical approach known as ‘community of philosophical inquiry’. We try to recuperate some of the places which have been attributed to children's voices in different interpretations of the community of inquiry. Be it as a place for democratic participation of all its members, regardless of their age, or as an opportunity for the free and creative expression of the voices that are a part of it, or even as critical challenges to the way in which current democracies exclude certain acoustic emissions, in recent years proposals have emerged that allow us to recover the phonetics of infant voices in the context of philosophical dialogues with children. One of such proposals consists of a practice of philosophical dialogue which rejects operational validation criteria dictated by pedagogical devices for measuring and improving skills or abilities: the “community of infancy”. Our proposal is not to understand the community of infancy as an exclusive alternative to the community of philosophical inquiry, but as an event which, insofar as it may emerge among the voices and words of the investigation, allows for an inoperative listening of that which phonetically inhabits the cracks of the shared dialogue. This is the listening that receives the words in their various phonetic materializations, accepting that thought emerges when one speaks and articulates, but also when one hesitates, stutters or babbles.
Downloads
References
Agamben, G. (2006). A linguagem e a morte. Um seminário sobre o lugar da negatividade, Editora UFMG.
Agamben, G. (2008). Infância e História. Destruição da experiência e origem da história, Editora UFMG.
Anderson, A. (2020). P4C and Voice: Does the Community of Philosophical Inquiry Provide Space for Children’s Free Expression? Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 40 (2), 17-31.
Bickford, B. (1996). The dissonance of democracy: listening, conflict and citizenship. Cronell University Press.
Bouchard, N.; Daniel, M.-F. (2018). Une typologie du dialogue en philosophie pour enfants examinée à partir d’un modèle d’analyse de l’éducation éthique. Spirale - Revue de recherches en éducation, 62(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/spir.062.0113
Chetty, D. (2018). Racism as ‘Reasonableness’: Philosophy for Children and the Gated Community of Inquiry. Ethics and Education, 13 (1), 39-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2018.1430933
Costa Carvalho, M. (2022). será que a voz que ouvimos por dentro é a mesma que as pessoas ouvem por fora?. childhood & philosophy, 18, 01–26, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2022.65690.
Costa Carvalho, M.; Almeida, T.; Taramona, J. M (2023). What are we missing? voice and listening as an event. childhood & philosophy, 19, 01–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2023.70451
De Marzio, D. M. (2017). Matthew Lipman’s Model Theory of the Community of Inquiry. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis. 38 (1), 37-46.
Despret, V. (2011). Leitura etnopsicológica do segredo. Fractal: Revista De Psicologia, 23(1), 5-28. Recuperado de https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4812
Echeverria, E.; Hannam, P. (2017). The community of philosophical inquiry (P4C): a pedagogical proposal for advancing democracy. In M. Gregory, J. Haynes, K. Murris (eds.). The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children, Routledge, 3-10.
Elicor, P. P. (2020), Resisting the ‘view from nowhere’: positionality in philosophy for/with children research. Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy, 21 (1), 19-33.
Fernandes, N.; Souza, L. F. (2020) Da afonia à voz das crianças nas pesquisas: Uma compreensão crítica do conceito de voz. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa (Auto)Biográfica, v. 5, n. 15, p. 970-986, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31892/rbpab2525-426X.2020.v5.n15.p970-986
Fletcher, N. (2016). Diseñar un espacio para voces reflexivas. relacionar el ethos del zine con la indagación filosófica dirigida por jóvenes. childhood & philosophy, 12, 25, 473–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2016.26352
Frias, R.; Diniz, D.; Carvalho, N. (2023). estaremos prontos para a escuta das crianças?. childhood & philosophy, 19, 01–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2023.76289
Ginzburg, N. (2019). Léxico Familiar. Lisboa: Relógio d’Água.
Haynes, J.; Murris, K. (2012). Picturebooks, Pedagogy and Philosophy. Routledge.
Kramer, S. (2002). Autoria e autorização: questões éticas na pesquisa com crianças. Cadernos de Pesquisa, n. 116, p. 41-59.
Jasinski, I. (2018). Giorgio Agamben: Education Without End. Springer.
Jasinski, I.; Lewis, T. (2016). Community of Infancy: Suspending the Sovereignty of the Teacher's Voice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50, (4), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12154
Johansson, V. (2018). Philosophy for Children and Children for Philosophy: Possibilities and Problems. In Smeyers, P. (eds.) International Handbook of Philosophy of Education, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5_79
Kennedy, N.; Kennedy, D. (2012). Community of Philosophical Inquiry as a Discoursive Structure, and its role in School Curriculum Design. In N. Vansieleghem, D. Kennedy (eds.). Philosophy for Children in Transition: Problems and Prospects. Blackwell Publishing, 97-116.
Kizel, A. (2016). Enabling identity: The challenge of presenting the silenced voices of repressed groups in philosophic communities of inquiry. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 3(1), pp. 16-39.
Kizel, A. (2024). Enabling Students' Voices and Identities. Philosophical Inquiry in a Time of Discord. Lexington Books.
Kohan, W. (2006). Filosofia para Crianças. In A. Dias de Carvalho (coord.). Dicionário de Filosofia da Educação, Porto Editora, 177-181.
Komulainen, S. (2007). The Ambiguity of the Child's 'Voice' in Social Research. Childhood, 14, https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568207068561
Lestrade, A. de; Docampo, V. (2012). A Grande Fábrica das Palavras. Paleta de Letras.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education. Cambridge University Press.
Matos, S.; Vieira, P. (2023). a filosofia da infância e a participação política das crianças: desafios poli(s)fónicos. childhood & philosophy, 19, 01–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2023.70501
Mazzei, L. (2009). “An impossibly full voice”. In Alecia Y. Jackson and Lisa A. Mazzei (eds.). Voice in qualitative Inquiry. Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research. Routledge.
Mohr Lone, J. (2021). Seen and Not Heard: Why Children’s Voices Matter. Rowman & Littlefield.
Murris, K. (2015). The Philosophy for Children Curriculum: Resisting ‘Teacher Proof’ Texts and the Formation of the Ideal Philosopher Child. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9466-3
Reynolds, R. A. (2024). Re-membering the lands of schooling. Global studies of childhood, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/20436106241305372
Rollo, T. (2021). Democratic silence: two forms of domination in the social contract tradition. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24 (3), 316-329, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1796330
Sharp, A. M. (1987). What is a ‘Community of Inquiry’? Journal of Moral Education. 16 (1), 37-44.
Splitter, L. (2022). The Teacher in a Community of (Philosophical) Inquiry ‘A Guide on the Stage and Sage on the Side’. In A. Kizel (ed.). Philosophy with Children and Teacher Education. Global Perspectives on Critical, Creative and Caring Thinking. Routledge.
Striano, M. (2011). A comunidade de investigação filosófica como uma matriz social e cognitiva. childhood & philosophy, 7 (13), 91-102.
Spyrou, S. (2011). The limits of children's voices: From authenticity to critical, reflexive representation. Childhood, 18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0907568210387834
Spyrou, S. (2016). Researching children’s silences: Exploring the fullness of voice in childhood research, Childhood, 23 (1), 7-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0907568215571618
Tamboukou, M. (2020): Narrative rhythmanalysis: the art and politics of listening to women’s narratives of forced displacement. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1769271
Vieira, P. (2019). intersubjetividade: um olhar sobre a comunidade de investigação filosófica. childhood & philosophy, 15, 01–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2019.42218
Weber, B. (2020). Phenomenology as a Voice of Childhood. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 40 (2), 32-43.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Magda Costa-Carvalho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina License.




